RUM = Real User Monitoring (browser performance software). Sadly, this site does not cover the alcoholic spirit.
RUMCost.com
Anti-pitch hook · The vendors that won't quote

Quote-Only RUM Vendors 2026

Five of the 18 vendors in our matrix refuse to publish per-session, per-GB, or tier pricing. Here's why that matters operationally, and what published-pricing alternatives exist for each.

Direct answer
Why won't five vendors quote a price publicly?
Three reasons: enterprise-only positioning (Akamai mPulse, Splunk RUM), bundled-with-other-products economics (Splunk RUM inside Observability Cloud), and discount-protection strategy (Fullstory, Catchpoint enterprise, published list pricing would set the floor for every negotiation).

The five

From our 2026-06-16 verification pass:

The operational cost of vendor opacity

When quote-only is acceptable

When quote-only is not acceptable

Published-pricing alternatives by category

Instead of Akamai mPulse

Instead of Splunk RUM

Instead of Pingdom RUM (unverified)

Instead of Fullstory paid tiers

Instead of Catchpoint enterprise

What we won't do

We do not fabricate dollar figures for quote-only vendors. Other comparison sites in this category routinely publish “starts around $X/month” estimates for quote-only RUM vendors based on third-party reports, leaked customer contracts, or analyst commentary. We don't. The risk of misleading a procurement team into committing budget against a fabricated rate is too high. We mark each quote-only vendor with a Quote Only badge, link to their contact page, and provide directional commentary (“likely in the $30K-$200K/yr range based on broader Akamai pricing patterns”) on the per-vendor page only.

Last verified June 2026